Good Clinical Practice Guide
Results 1 to 10 of 18

Thread: MHRA produced FAQs for Trial Master Files (TMF) and Archiving

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    14. How long should the TMF be retained (archived) after the trial is completed?

    Retention of the documents within the TMF (including the investigator site file) and the medical records of trial subjects is a legal requirement. The sponsor and the chief investigator must ensure that the documents contained, or which have been contained, in the TMF as well as the medical files of trial subjects are retained for at least 5 years after the conclusion of the trial (SI 2004/1031 [as amended] 31A, (7) and (8)). Trials where the data are used to support a marketing authorisation have further requirements as per Statutory Instrument 2004/3224 implementing Commission Directive 2003/63/EC. Here the documentation should be retained for at least 15 years after completion or discontinuation of the trial or for at least two years after the granting of the last marketing authorisation in the EC (when there are no pending or contemplated marketing applications in the EC) or for at least two years after formal discontinuation of clinical development of the investigational product. Additionally, the sponsor or other owner of the data must retain all other documentation pertaining to the trial as long as the product is authorised. This documentation shall include the trial protocol (which must include the rationale, objectives and statistical design and methodology of the trial, with conditions under which it is performed and managed, details of the investigational product, the reference medicinal product and/or the placebo used), any standard operating procedures used for conducting the trial, all written opinions on the protocol and procedures, the investigator’s brochure, case report forms on each trial subject, final report and audit certificate(s), if available, and staff training records. Additionally, the final report shall be retained by the sponsor or subsequent owner, for five years after the medicinal product is no longer authorised.

    Trial subject’s medical files must be retained for at least 5 years in their original format and in accordance with the maximum period of time permitted by the hospital, institution or private practice. Scanning or microfiching of patient notes is acceptable provided the process is validated such that the institution can demonstrate that it is an authentic copy of the original and is kept in a format that means that the data can be retrieved in the future. It is recommended that the notes of patients that have been involved in clinical trials are clearly identified to prevent premature destruction. Many UK hospitals attach stickers to the notes with a “do not destroy” or “retain until” date clearly marked.

    In addition to these retention times for the trial documentation, records relating to the full traceability of the IMP for Advanced Therapies have longer retention periods. These are 30 years after the expiry date of the product or longer if required by the clinical trial authorisation. This will include the relevant documentation contained in the sponsor and investigator files as well as the trial subjects’ medical records. Further information can be found in the EU detailed guidance on GCP for advanced therapy medicinal products, (2009).

    It is the responsibility of the sponsor to inform the hospital, institution or practice as to when these documents no longer need to be retained. As such, the expectation would be that the retention requirements of the sponsor for the documentation and medical records held by the investigator should be agreed either in the protocol or a separate agreement. The sponsor would be expected to have systems in place to alert the investigator when the records are no longer required to be retained. The sponsor should notify investigators in writing when their trial records can be destroyed and up until that point the investigator or institution should take measures to prevent accidental or premature destruction of these documents. The ultimate responsibility for the documents to be retained by the investigator or institution resides with the investigator or institution. If the investigator becomes unable to be responsible for their essential documents (e.g. relocation, retirement etc) the sponsor should be notified in writing of this change and informed as to whom the responsibility has been transferred.

    The EU Regulation on Medicinal Products for Paediatric Use 1901/2006, adopted in December 2006 and came into force in January 2007, enables the use of data from published literature for the application of Paediatric Use Marketing Authorisations (PUMAs). To this end, the archiving requirements should meet the requirement of Commission Directive 2003/63/EC. The data may not be used for a MAA when the TMF is only maintained for 5 years.

    It is important that where an organisation has centralised records that may be relevant to a number of trials, for example, SOPs, staff training records or maintenance and calibration records for equipment used in the trial at a Phase 1 unit/NHS clinical research unit; that these are also considered in the arrangements for archiving and retention (including superseded versions or obsolete records for example training records of personnel who have left the organisation) as they may be required to be produced in addition to the TMF to demonstrate compliance.

    The protocol or the formal procedures of the sponsor should contain details of the retention times for all the trial documentation as outlined above or the process used to determine how long particular documentation will be retained for and how this should be documented.

    The requirements for the retention of sponsors’ records also apply to the records retained by CROs or other agents of the sponsor, unless arrangements have been made to transfer the documents to the sponsor. The details of the retention time of documents held by the CRO should be formalised in an agreement between the sponsor and the CRO or be clear within the CRO’s SOPs that will have been reviewed by the sponsor.

    Investigators can retire, hospitals can close and CROs (some of which are also investigator sites, e.g. commercial phase 1 units) can go out of business or be acquired by other organisations. The sponsor should ensure that agreements cover such eventualities to ensure that the documentation remains available for inspection for the specified retention time. Sponsors outside of the UK should ensure that provision is made to make the archived documents for trials conducted in the UK available to the MHRA throughout the retention period, in particular for documentation held by CROs. This issue has occurred on several occasions in the UK when phase 1 units have closed and there has not been any contact with the trial sponsors to ensure the long term availability of their investigators files and data until the MHRA was informed.

    Version 1: 17th December 2012

  2. #2
    15. Can the sponsor retain (archive) the investigator’s TMF?

    The investigator should retain control of the documentation contained in the investigator site file. The investigator site file should never be sent to the sponsor organisation except in sponsor-investigator situations. This requirement does not mean that an external sponsor cannot arrange the archiving on behalf of the investigator, which is acceptable, subject to the following being implemented:

    • The archive arrangements are formally agreed and documented between the sponsor and investigator or host institution
    • A formal procedure is in place such that the documents are only released from the external archive with the approval of the investigator or host institution. It is recommended that this is tested for robustness. Permission from the investigator or host organisation should also be required to permit access to the contents of investigator site archived materials at the archive facility
    • The records go directly between the investigator site and an archive facility independent of the sponsor, thereby ensuring that the Sponsor does not have uncontrolled access to the investigator files.

    Version 1: 17th December 2012

  3. #3
    16. Are there any requirements for the archive storage conditions?

    The storage area for the TMF records must be appropriate to maintain the documents such that they remain complete and legible throughout the required period of retention and can be made available to the competent authorities upon request. This should be assessed on a risk based approach. Where a sponsor is conducting many trials in support of a marketing authorisation, the requirement for long term storage in appropriate conditions will be higher than for a sponsor-investigator undertaking one small Type A category trial where its publication is not likely to affect prescribing practice. Adequate and suitable space should be provided for the secure storage of all essential records from completed trials. Thus, for an investigator storing a TMF or investigator site file the sponsor may consider that the office filing cabinet may provide a suitably secure environment for a 5 year retention period, whereas a large sponsor that is required to retain documents in excess of 15 years, may need more specialist facilities with sufficient level of controls. The areas to be considered when performing such a risk assessment include:

    • Security – how accessible are the documents, are there locks in place on doors/cupboards, what is the risk of unauthorised access, are there windows on the ground floor etc?
    • Location - what risks are there from water (burst pipes, flood), fire (what activities take place in the room next door/above/below), what runs in the ceiling/floor void etc?
    • Size – is the archive facility large enough and have the appropriate off floor shelving to accommodate the expected documentation?
    • Environmental – are there risks from excessive temperature, humidity, sunlight, contamination (dust, fumes, smoke etc)?
    • Pests – are there risks from rodents, insects etc?

    The British Standard BS 5454:2000 “Recommendations for the storage and exhibition of archival documents” is a standard for commercial archive facilities and sponsors may refer to this for consideration in maintaining purpose built archive facilities as well as taking it into account when assessing potential contract archiving companies.

    It is essential that sponsors make a documented assessment of the storage conditions at the investigator site for the investigator site file and that the investigator provides this information. The importance is illustrated by a UK investigator site where the archive facility was inspected and found to contain an automatic water pump to extract flood water, together with numerous decorating products stored above the investigator site files. The inspector outlined the risks to the documentation, but this was not acted upon as a subsequent serious breach report was received of water damage to the investigator files when the pump failed to operate during a river flood.

    Version 1: 17th December 2012

  4. #4
    17. How should electronic documents/data be archived?

    The use of electronic systems for such activities as data management, statistical analysis, reporting, trial management systems and eTMFs means that electronic documentation and data is likely to need to be retained. The data may be on a server or on transportable media, e.g. USB drives, CDs, tapes etc. It is recommended that more than one copy of the data is retained, for example where the data is archived in a specific server, this should be subject to back up, with the back up media stored in a separate location. Consideration may be given to storing the data in differing formats on different types of media or even on the same media from different manufacturers.

    Access to archived data must be suitably restricted, either by user access levels to the archive area of a server or by controls to access the storage area where the media are retained (as for paper). Additionally, the electronic documents or data that have been archived must be protected from unauthorised changes to maintain authenticity.

    It is important that future access to records and data is maintained. This could include maintaining the system (hardware and software) to access the data in its original format or the use of a new system to emulate the old software or migration of the data into a new format to ensure continual access with new software. This issue should be addressed by the organisation via formal procedures.

    Media used to store the data may potentially deteriorate or become obsolete, for example, during a recent inspection a paper file contained a 3.5” floppy diskette containing the randomisation schedule. At the current time, PCs with ability to use such media are rare and future potential access would not be guaranteed, thus transfer to an alternative would need to be considered. The media should be stored under appropriate conditions. The transfer of data to new media as technology advances would need to be considered by the organisation. It is also recommended that periodic test retrieval or restores are undertaken to confirm that ongoing availability to the data is being maintained.

    Where data is required to be migrated to new media or a new format, then the transfer should be validated and fully documented, so that it can be subject to audit, to ensure and demonstrate that there has been no loss, changes or corruption to the data or meta data and that authenticity is maintained.

    Version 1: 17th December 2012

  5. #5
    18. Is there a need for an Archivist?

    It is a legal requirement that the sponsor appoints a named individual within the organisation to be responsible for archiving the documents which are, or have been, contained in the TMF and that access to these documents shall be restricted to those appointed individuals and auditors or inspectors (SI 2004/1031 [as amended] 31A, (9)). There can be more than one such person named and the requirement can be met by either having specific archivist role(s) or person(s) in another role may also have the specific archiving duties, but either way there should be clear documentation to support the appointment(s) and appropriate training provided. The named individual responsible must have a clear legal link to the sponsor, in that they are the sponsor/co-sponsor themselves or employed or contracted by the sponsor/co-sponsor (SI 2004/1031 [as amended] 31A, (11)). Whilst an investigator site institution is not required to have a named individual (unless they are a sponsor in their own right), where the organisation has many trials, a person responsible for this activity would be recommended.

    Version 1: 17th December 2012

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •