-
23rd Jan 2012, 12:19 PM
#1
I think what is being referred to here is validation of fitness for purpose for your application of the software. It would not be expected that you would do a full validation of the software as it's out with your scope within a CTU.
What is expected is that you test the system you want to use by formally documenting a plan, its execution and its results, set your own pass criteria and report the progress on meeting your targets. It is essential to stress test your planned use such that you can provide operational limits.
HTH
Graham
-
21st Jun 2012, 06:42 PM
#2
I cant understand .. How it works at academic trials???????
Can any one help ?
-
3rd Jul 2015, 09:24 AM
#3
a great forum only regret is that my English level is not good to be able to understand!! sorry ( i hope every body can understand me (
-
14th Apr 2016, 05:25 PM
#4
I think you can use Google/Bing translate to understand and comminicate. Step by step.
-
15th Apr 2016, 09:13 AM
#5
Moderator
Commercial off-the-shelf packages would not require revalidation, but it may be appropriate to undertake installation, operational and performance qualifications. The key requirement is that any trial specific configuration/build/programming etc within the system is evaluated as fit-for-purpose (validated) and that this assessment is appropriately documented. For further information see the MHRA GCP Guide 14.5.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules