-
2nd Mar 2016, 01:27 AM
#1
protocol Deviations due to visits -- how to prevent
Do you have an example of a statement in a protocol that allowed variations to visit windows and thus out of window visits (not on the scheduled day) were not deemed protocol deviations. Currently, a statement to this effect is not in the protocol and the PI does not want to have a window of say 3 days, but it is a logistical nightmare regarding data management and monitoring reports.
Last edited by MHRA Moderator; 2nd Mar 2016 at 11:10 AM.
Reason: Removal of duplicate text
-
5th May 2019, 07:11 PM
#2
The protocol needs to be followed otherwise, by definition, there is a protocol deviation. If you need longer windows then this should be included in an amendment.
Whether of not the subsequent protocol deviations are deemed to be "significant" from a subject welfare or data integrity perspective should then be determined by the project team, including the Medical Monitor, Clinical Scientist and Statistician.
-
14th Jun 2019, 07:46 PM
#3
ICH has an excellent document ICH E3
EMA/CHMP/ICH/435606/2012
Committee for medicinal products human use (CHMP)
ICH guideline E3 - questions and answers (R1)
Step 5. July 2012
Q; What is the distinction between a protocol deviation, important protocol deviation, and a protocol violation?
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules